Laws concerning ones rights against unlawful bailiffs

Entrez votre texte ici...

 CRIMINAL LAW ACT 1977 PART II
OFFENCES RELATING TO ENTERING AND REMAINING ON PROPERTY

......................................................................................................

Click the link below to download the Pdf. file:

 CRIMINAL LAW ACT 1977 PART II
OFFENCES RELATING TO ENTERING AND REMAINING ON PROPERTY
6 Violence for securing entry.
(1)Subject to the following provisions of this section, any person who, without lawful authority, uses or threatens violence for the purpose of securing entry into any premises for himself or for any other person is guilty of an offence, provided that-
(a)there is someone present on those premises at the time who is opposed to the entry which the violence is intended to secure; and
(b)the person using or threatening the violence knows that that is the case.
POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984
17 Entry for purpose of arrest etc.
(1) Subject to the following provisions of this section, and without prejudice to any other enactment, a constable may enter and search any premises for the purpose- (e) of saving life or limb or preventing serious damage to property.  

 CASE LAW Remove implied rights of access .........................

Click below for pdf.

 CASE LAW
Remove implied rights of access
This was endorsed by Lord Justice Donaldson in the case of Lambert v Roberts [1981] 72 Cr App R 223 - and placing such a notice is akin to a closed door but it also prevents a bailiff entering the garden or driveway, Knox v Anderton [1983] Crim LR 115 or R. v Leroy Roberts [2003] EWCA Crim 2753
If you don't remove a Implied rights of access, a door left open is an implied license for a bailiff to enter, Faulkner v Willetts [1982] Crim LR 453
Debtors can also remove implied right of access to property by telling him to leave:
Davis v Lisle [1936] 2 KB 434 similarly, McArdle v Wallace [1964] 108 Sol Jo 483
A person having been told to leave is now under a duty to withdraw from the property with all due reasonable speed and failure to do so he is not thereafter acting in the execution of his duty and becomes a trespasser with any subsequent levy made being invalid and attracts a liability under a claim for damages,
Morris v Beardmore [1980] 71 Cr App 256.
A bailiff rendered a trespasser is liable for penalties in tort and the entry may be in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights if entry is not made in accordance with the law, Jokinen v Finland [2009] 37233/07
Bailiffs cannot force their way into a private dwelling, Grove v Eastern Gas [1952] 1 KB 77.
A debtor can use an equal amount of force to resist a bailiff from gaining entry
Weaver V Bush [1795] 8TR
Simpson V Morris [1813] 4 Taunt 821
Polkinhorne V Wright [1845] 8QB 197
Another occupier or an employee may also take these steps:
Hall V Davis [1825] 2 C&P 33
Also wrongful would be an attempt at forcible entry despite resistance Ingle V Bell [1836] 1 M&W 516
Bailiffs cannot apply force to a door to gain entry, and if he does he is not in the execution of his duty Broughton V Wilkerson [1880] 44 JP 781
A Bailiff may not encourage a third party to allow the bailiff access to a property (i.e. workmen inside a house), access by this means renders the entry unlawful Nash V Lucas [1867] 2 QB 590
A person standing back to allow the bailiff to walk through, but the bailiff must not abuse this license by entering by improper means or by unusual routes, Ancaster v Milling [1823] 2 D&R 714 or Rogers v Spence [1846] M&W 571
A person (from 2014 onwards - without a warrant of control) having been told to leave is now under a duty to withdraw from the property with all due reasonable speed and failure to do so he is not thereafter acting in the execution of his duty and becomes a trespasser with any subsequent levy made being invalid and attracts a liability under a claim for damages,
Morris V Beardmore [1980] 71 Cr App 256
The debtor's home and all buildings within the boundary of the premises are protected against forced entry, Munroe & Munroe v Woodspring District Council [1979] Weston-Super-Mare County Court
It is not contempt to assault a bailiff trying to climb over a locked gate after being refused entry, Lewis v Owen [1893] The Times November 6 p.36b (QBD)
If a bailiff enters by force he is there unlawfully and you can treat him as a trespasser. Curlewis v Laurie [1848] or Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557
A debtor cannot be sued if a person enters a property uninvited and injures himself because he had no legal right to enter, Great Central Railway Co v Bates [1921] 3 KB 578
Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557 if the debtor strikes the bailiff over the head with a full milk bottle after making a forced entry, the debtor is not guilty of assault because the bailiff was there illegally, likewise R. v Tucker at Hove Trial Centre Crown Court, December 2012.
If a person strikes a trespasser who has refused to leave is not guilty of an offence: Davis v Lisle [1936] 2 KB 434  

Laws to protect property Trust......................................

..........................................................

Click the link below to download the Pdf.

 Laws to protect property
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkvgdN4iH-g TS 25.13
The UK Council Tax Scam: How To Legally NOT Pay & Beat Council Tax For Good
Administration of Justice Act 1970 Part 5 Miscellaneous provisions 1a
The UK Council Tax Scam: How To Legally NOT Pay & Beat Council Tax For Good
https://youtu.be/NQK5UcF4GGM?t=873 Bailbums Clowncil And Clowns In Costumes
TS 14.33 No entry even with violence breaking a lock on my property Private trust
+ TS 28.33 Bailiffs cannot apply force to gain entry Broughton v Wilkerson 1880,
44 JP 781 case law common law by judge TS 31.08 The debtors home and all buildings within the boundary of the premises are protected against forced entry - munroe and munroe vs Woodspring Council 1979

COUNCIL TAX FRAUD.....................................................

From :Peter -  Law common to Man

Click the link below to download the Pdf.

 COUNCIL TAX FRAUD

Magistrates court is for criminal cases County court is for civil cases (debts etc)
Clowncil tax is simply a debt and not a tax. So it can only be civil.
Why do they issue a summons from a magistrates court?
They don't, the council simply print their own. It is a fake summons and a fake liability order.
Any summons must follow the civil procedures rules (cpr)
Magistrates court Act 1980 Section 51
Local Government Act 1888 section 78 (2)
Administration of Justice Act 1970 part 5
Perjury Act 1911 Section 5
Fraud Act 2006 Section 3
Fraud Act 2006 section 7
Data Protection Act 2018 173
Council Tax (administration and enforcement) regulations 1992 Number 613 schedule 2
Form A
Originally provided to draw up liability orders
Withdrawn 1st October 2003
Never replaced
Resolution 3 council tax (administration and enforcement) (amendment) number 2
(England) regulations 2003 number 2211
There can be no liability order

 UTILITIES 
From :Peter Law common to man

 FUTILITIES

All so called energy suppliers are simply credit brokers. They are agents and are all under the Financial Conduct authority for financial institutions such as banks, and credit brokers.
They supply nothing to you. Go to their website and check their information. They are simply agents and are only charging you because of the serial number on the meter.
i, do not want to get into the Cestui Que Vie trust or argue about how, when or why the natural commodities of the land belong to us, this is purely looking at their side of the coin, the legislation rather than the law.
But ask a solicitor what is common law and a lot of them will tell you that it is case law created by judges and judges rulings.
i, am not in agreeance with that statement, however, it is a very important fact to know and to use when we are dealing with those that have the misguided belief that they are better than others.
So as for the credit brokers, that are all registered corporations, do you have a contract with them?
We exist in a world of commerce, like it or not, it is how we exist. So, everything is held together by contracts.
Gas act 1986 in relation to safety
[F384B Exceptions from sections 4AA to 4A.
(1) Section 4AA does not apply in relation to the issuing by the Secretary of State of guidance under section 4AB.
(2) Sections 4AA to 4A do not apply in relation to anything done by the Authority-
(a) in the exercise of functions relating to the determination of disputes;
18 Safety regulations.
F259(1)
(2)The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision for empowering any officer authorised by the relevant authority-
(a)
to enter any premises in which there is a service pipe connected with a gas main, for the purpose of inspecting any gas fitting on the premises, any flue or means of ventilation used in connection with any such gas fitting, or [F260any part of the gas system on the premises, that is to say,]any service pipe or other apparatus (not being a gas fitting) which is on the premises and is used for the [F260conveyance or]supply of gas or is connected with a gas main;
(b)where he so enters any such premises, to examine or apply any test to any such object as is mentioned in paragraph (a) above and (where the object is a gas fitting) to verify what supply of air is available for it; Have a valid gas safety certificate and get one every year  
:Peter